<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unite Against Fascism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/06/09/unite-against-fascism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/06/09/unite-against-fascism/</link>
	<description>my life and some more important things...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/06/09/unite-against-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=995#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Had the same thing at Sussex, surprise surprise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the same thing at Sussex, surprise surprise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/06/09/unite-against-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=995#comment-523</guid>
		<description>I was thinking something similar. Our SU recently tried to pass a motion denying student societies the right to invite speakers from the BNP (and other similar groups) to speak. Who decides on what issues we should restrict free speech, and on what authority? Where will an eroding of the right to free speech lead? Big issues.

As you say, the BNP need to be defeated through honest debate, challenging their views, and solving the problems that have driven people to vote for them. Those at our SU AGM saw the need to keep free speech; unfortunately, those at the student council meeting refused to pass the pro-free-speech motion, due to not meeting quorum at the AGM.

Maybe it&#039;s just in student political circles, but there appears to be an assumed morality that denies those outside its constraints the right to hold their views, or at least speak them. Currently it&#039;s manifesting itself in anti-fascist actions; how long before Christian beliefs in the uniqueness of Christ, the reality of hell and the need for repentance elicit their active opposition, and we find our freedom to speak attacked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking something similar. Our SU recently tried to pass a motion denying student societies the right to invite speakers from the BNP (and other similar groups) to speak. Who decides on what issues we should restrict free speech, and on what authority? Where will an eroding of the right to free speech lead? Big issues.</p>
<p>As you say, the BNP need to be defeated through honest debate, challenging their views, and solving the problems that have driven people to vote for them. Those at our SU AGM saw the need to keep free speech; unfortunately, those at the student council meeting refused to pass the pro-free-speech motion, due to not meeting quorum at the AGM.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just in student political circles, but there appears to be an assumed morality that denies those outside its constraints the right to hold their views, or at least speak them. Currently it&#8217;s manifesting itself in anti-fascist actions; how long before Christian beliefs in the uniqueness of Christ, the reality of hell and the need for repentance elicit their active opposition, and we find our freedom to speak attacked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
