<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Bible really homophobic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/</link>
	<description>my life and some more important things...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=853#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Hello Infidel...

First thing to say is that &quot;Adam and Steve&quot; isn&#039;t really the crux of this debate... it is a question, an internal debate among Christian groups about what the Bible says on the subject.

On you question, I don&#039;t think your argument follows... We were created to eat food - different types, whether it grows on trees or not is not the point. We were created for relationships, one man/one woman, this is what the Bible says, this is also what creation says - ie. the mechanics of sex, procreation etc.

Cheers,
Hughbo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Infidel&#8230;</p>
<p>First thing to say is that &#8220;Adam and Steve&#8221; isn&#8217;t really the crux of this debate&#8230; it is a question, an internal debate among Christian groups about what the Bible says on the subject.</p>
<p>On you question, I don&#8217;t think your argument follows&#8230; We were created to eat food &#8211; different types, whether it grows on trees or not is not the point. We were created for relationships, one man/one woman, this is what the Bible says, this is also what creation says &#8211; ie. the mechanics of sex, procreation etc.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Hughbo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=853#comment-469</guid>
		<description>How is your Adam and Steve argument any more valid than &quot;If god had intended us to eat cookies, he would have made them grow on trees&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is your Adam and Steve argument any more valid than &#8220;If god had intended us to eat cookies, he would have made them grow on trees&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam &#38; Eve or Adam &#38; Steve? &#171; The Tankerfield Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam &#38; Eve or Adam &#38; Steve? &#171; The Tankerfield Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=853#comment-340</guid>
		<description>[...] 20, 2009 by Tom Roberts    Here&#8217;s a quote from an interesting article from my friend Hugh Bourne&#8217;s blog by Xander [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20, 2009 by Tom Roberts    Here&#8217;s a quote from an interesting article from my friend Hugh Bourne&#8217;s blog by Xander [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukewarm</title>
		<link>http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/2009/02/03/is-the-bible-really-homophobic/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukewarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughbourne.co.uk/?p=853#comment-335</guid>
		<description>This may be a little off topic, but I dont think the Bible is homophobic or ever has been. Homophobia means scared of gay people right? but is God scared of them? No.

If I was gay, would Jesus love me? Yes. The difference is that Jesus would hate the sin and hate it when I continue with the sin. The good shepherd is the one that leaves behind 99sheep to find that 1 lost lamb.

Love the person, hate the sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a little off topic, but I dont think the Bible is homophobic or ever has been. Homophobia means scared of gay people right? but is God scared of them? No.</p>
<p>If I was gay, would Jesus love me? Yes. The difference is that Jesus would hate the sin and hate it when I continue with the sin. The good shepherd is the one that leaves behind 99sheep to find that 1 lost lamb.</p>
<p>Love the person, hate the sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
